I have been curious about General Semantics for quite a while, but after I recently read a science fiction book by Van Vogt that talked about it, I finally decided to actually find out more.
I was not sure that I would want to spend the time reading some very long book on the subject, but as luck would have it, I guess, I came across this outline of the subject by Kenneth Johnson. The outline itself is only 34 pages long (in the version I read) and was very easy to follow and very informative to me at least.
The main point to take from it is, I guess, that we take many things for granted in how we observe the world around us and communicate with it. We leave out many details, and then act as if we we have the full picture or at least what is truly important, while this is often not the case. This can lead to innumerable problems.
It seems that even merely being and staying aware of this issue on details goes far in solving such problems or at least in minimizing their bad effects. Going a little further and applying the scientific method when evaluating would probably result in something even better as the outline explains.
I recommend giving the outline a try at least. By the way, it is available free on the Institute of General Semantics website.
I was not sure that I would want to spend the time reading some very long book on the subject, but as luck would have it, I guess, I came across this outline of the subject by Kenneth Johnson. The outline itself is only 34 pages long (in the version I read) and was very easy to follow and very informative to me at least.
The main point to take from it is, I guess, that we take many things for granted in how we observe the world around us and communicate with it. We leave out many details, and then act as if we we have the full picture or at least what is truly important, while this is often not the case. This can lead to innumerable problems.
It seems that even merely being and staying aware of this issue on details goes far in solving such problems or at least in minimizing their bad effects. Going a little further and applying the scientific method when evaluating would probably result in something even better as the outline explains.
I recommend giving the outline a try at least. By the way, it is available free on the Institute of General Semantics website.