This book deals with issues relating to genetic engineering in humans - more policy/ethics than science.
I wanted to like this book. The subject is something I am quite interested in learning more about. Though the book had a few interesting parts, I was disappointed for the most part.
I'll start with Good Points. The cover art was perfect - made the book very enticing. The book itself was a very sturdy, high quality hardcover - so many hardcover books today are very shoddily constructed. Background information presented for various sections of the book was often interesting and well presented. A few "food for thought" ethical issues were well presented and discussed.
Now for the Bad Points. At the beginning of the book, the writing itself was OK, but it left much to be desired as the book went on. Overly long paragraphs and unnecessarily complex sentence structure made it very hard to follow what the author was trying to say. Did the publisher edit this book or just publish a rough draft? Section subtitles would have helped a lot - they used some odd symbol instead which added very little by way of clarity. Overall, I would have a hard time telling anyone what the author's main points were - that's how confused the book left me.
When I read non-fiction, I prefer books where the author is objective. I find it hard to call this author objective when this book made it crystal clear that he is very partisan politically and which side of the aisle he cheers for, so to speak.
The author is a law professor and wrote this more like a law review article than anything else - I'm a lawyer, so I can tell. That didn't turn out well in this context. It's really the way he handled sources - I have no idea who these people are and information given about them does little to clarify, so why should I care what they think kind of explains how it came off.
Finally, there are factual errors. Other reviewers have commented on several - and added that the author was probably a political science major and way out of his depth here given that so much hard science is involved. I saw two errors that I didn't see mentioned in other reviews. First, an embryo does not turn into a fetus simply by becoming implanted in a womb as the author states - an embryo becomes a fetus after a given number of weeks (some say it's 11) of gestation. Second, in Gonzalez v Carhart, the Supreme Court did NOT uphold partial birth abortions as the author states, it rather upheld a federal law banning them. Do editors not fact check anything anymore?
Though it had some good points, I would not recommend this book.